Virginia Politician Joins Ranks of Political Dumbassery


Over the years, we’ve seen a lot of stories about the burning stupid of politicians. There was Hank “Guam is capsizing” Johnson, who worried that the small island would actually tip over if we staged a military buildup there.

There was this moron Joe Salazar, who didn’t think women should defend themselves against rape with a gun, because they’re just too emotional and stupid to do so. Use call boxes and whistles, he told potential rape victims.

There was Sheila Jackson Lee, who thought the Democrats should write Executive Orders for the President.

There was Todd Akin’s blisteringly dumb “legitimate rape” comment.

There were Anthony Weiner’s numerous gaffes with Weiner Jr.

There was Sarah Palin’s “North Korean allies” gaffe.

And there was Corrine Brown’s historic speech on the floor of the Congress, “GO GATA!” which will forever go down in history as one of the most entertaining speeches on the House floor – one that never fails to crack me up.

The list of politician stupid is too long to detail, and frankly, there’s just not enough bandwidth to do it justice.

And recently, it looks like a Virginia legisleech is joining the ranks of the stupid.

In his efforts to relieve Virginia gun owners of their rights, Alfonso Lopez (D-umbass, Arlington) has introduced new legislation to ban high capacity magazines in the Commonwealth. In order to add gravitas… or just hysterical idiocy… to his proposal, Lopez decided to show just how “unsafe” the residents of the Old Dominion are with these evil high capacity magazines running around.

“Since 1931, federal law prohibits me from having more than three shotgun shells in my shotgun when I’m duck hunting,” he said. “That means that ducks have more protection than people in Virginia.

“Let me repeat that: Under the law, ducks have more protection than people in Virginia,” Lopez said.

Yep. Ducks are apparently safer in Virginia than humans, says Lopez.

Well, PolitiFact disagrees. As a matter of fact, they gave this claim their “Pants on Fire” rating, meaning if Lopez was any more off, his pants would double as an incendiary device used in controlled forest burns.

The very premise of Lopez’s claim is flawed. It’s legal to hunt ducks in Virginia. If you shoot one with a barred firearm for duck hunting, it’s a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum $500 fine.

It’s illegal to shoot people in Virginia with any firearm, except in limited instances of self defense.

The murder of person in Virginia is punishable by death or lengthy prison sentences. There’s no jail time for shooting a duck, even if it’s done with an illegal shotgun.

It’s illegal to even point a gun at another person in Virginia in a menacing way, a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in prison and a $2,500 fine. State law is silent about pointing a gun at a duck.

For his part, the idiot tried to walk back his lunacy, claiming that’s not what he meant, but PolitiFact points out that not only did he say exactly that “ducks have more protection that people” from assault gun violence, but that he repeated it to drive the point home.

I’m sure the ducks are worried.

Bateman gets chapped labia


I know I’ve been away for a while. I wanted to step away from the 2014 election and let things cool off a little. To say I have little faith in the GOP and its ability to accomplish anything of actual value to this country is an understatement. Although, I will admit that the teeth-gnashing, hand-wringing, spin-filled reaction from the butthurt Democrat camp was amusing to watch, as they tried to make excuses for their significant losses – everything from the DERP-filled “VOTERS WERE DISENFRANCHISED!” to “WE MADE #GUNSENSE PROGRESS!” to “REPUBLICANS ARE POOPY HEADS AND THIS ELECTION DOESN’T MEAN ANYTHING.”

I admit it. I laughed.

I always like a good chuckle, especially when the now-infamous, violence planner, oath-breaking coward LTC (ret.) Robert (mastur)Bateman pens another angst-filled screed about the evils of guns, the evils of the NRA, and the evils of Second Amendment advocates. Because RIGHTS BAD!

What has Bob’s panties all bunched up in his puckered anus this time? Apparently, someone had the unmitigated gall to exercise their Second Amendment rights in his presence!

And because Bob considers himself an authority on what the citizens of this country, whose Constitution he swore an oath to defend, need and what rights they should be allowed to exercise, he took a wet, nervous dump in his Underoos when he saw a guy open carrying his pistol.

I’m not going to fisk his sniveling treatise, because a) I have no time to address gun banner monkey turd flinging not based in any fact and 2) I don’t want to give (mastur)Bateman more attention than he deserves. So I’m merely going to give you his bottom line, which consists of whimpering that no one needs a gun in a family restaurant (as if a paunchy, half-literate, retired, attention-whoring O-5 is somehow a viable arbiter for anyone’s needs) and a plaintive whimper about America’s “gun culture” and how it (the culture – not criminals, or negligence) kills or wounds something like 100 thousand Americans (without acknowledging that deaths by firearms, and violent crimes in general have been declining steadily over the years, while gun ownership has risen).


I’m also going to ridicule Bob a bit, because Bob is an idiot. Bob sneers about the motto Second Amendment advocates (and the big, bad NRA!) have adopted as a defiant warning to the politicians and retired O-5s who bloviate about taking away their natural rights. “Molon Labe,” Bob claims, was appropriated from the movie “The 300” by gun rights advocates, who are unaware of  its history. soccent-2 Never mind the movie came out in 2006, and gun rights advocates have been using this particular phrase since at least the 1990s. Never mind that it’s the current motto of the United States Special Operations Command Central (SOCCENT), and has been used in that very same spirit of defiance during the Texas revolution. Not that Bob has any respect for actual members of the military or anyone fighting for actual freedom – you know, those who didn’t spend their careers warping the minds of young cadets or lounging around at NATO, “planning violence” – but it’s always useful for panty-shitting cowards to excoriate others based on their alleged “knowledge” of King Leonidas’ Sparta, from whom the quote allegedly originated, rather than comprehend the spirit of the quote itself, which has been used by modern day armies and individuals as a cry of defiance for several hundred years.

And because Bob has no comprehension of honor, but rather chooses to crawl like a cockroach and lick the hands of his masters in vain hopes of perhaps getting appointed to some bureaucratic position somewhere in DC, he would rather focus on the “apocryphal” source of the quote than its meaning and what it has come to represent.

It’s OK, Bob. We understand that your lack of testicular fortitude prompts you to consistently bait gun owners from the relative safety of your computer at home. We also understand that despite your teary-eyed claims of being victimized by threats from gun owners, the vast majority of gun owners wouldn’t waste their time on vermin such as you other than to ridicule your lack of basic understanding of natural rights and your sneering contempt for the very people whose rights you swore an oath to protect. (Unlike your gun grabber friends who gleefully celebrate the thought of someone’s child being harmed, and plan how to best cause the deaths of gun owners by SWATting – such nice company you keep, Bob!)


So it’s time to once again ridicule Bob for being an oath-breaking, snot-nosed coward who soils himself at the sight of a normal guy peaceably exercising his right to keep and bear arms in public. Someone hand Bob a tissue and one of these.


You mean the vagina voters elected a corruptocrat?


Wow, I’m so shocked!

The Virginia legislature years ago banned governors from donating excess inauguration funds to political causes, but that hasn’t stopped Gov. Terry McAuliffe from finding a way to route $211,000 from his inaugural fund back to his election campaign and the Virginia Democratic Party, disclosure records show.

Mr. McAuliffe’s aides say the two $78,000 checks his inaugural committee sent to his campaign committee along with a $55,000 check to the state Democratic Party were expenditures for the rental of email lists. But campaign finance analysts told The Washington Times that the costs of the email rentals appeared to be exorbitant, and critics suggest the transactions look like an end run around the state prohibition.

Corrupt. Slimy. Odious. Detestable. Degenerate. Sordid. Crooked. Unscrupulous. Double-dealing. Perfidious. Degenerate.

This is what the vagina voters in Virginia turned out in droves to support. Never mind that he will expand the role of the state and poke it into every orifice in your life (other than your vagina, of course, because it’s much more sacrosanct than your wallet). Never mind the expansion of the nanny state. Ken Cuccinelli wanted to control your vagina! That’s all that matters!

Thanks, vagina voters! Thanks a whole bunch!

Harvey Weinstein on a mission


Hollywood movie producer, overstuffed, paunchy swine and self-important douchecracker Harvey Weinstein is on a mission. He wants to destroy the NRA.

And how, you ask, will this pompous sack of droppings go about destroying an organization of millions of people who value their rights? Is he going to blow up the NRA building? Nope. Will he use his considerable resources to push for more gun control laws? Tried it. Didn’t work. So he’s going to make a movie. Yep. That’s what he told Howard Stern on his radio show today. He’s going to make a movie.

Mr. Weinstein then revealed his secret project about the gun rights group. “I shouldn’t say this, but I’ll tell it to you, Howard,” he said. “I’m going to make a movie with Meryl Streep, and we’re going to take this head-on. And they’re going to wish they weren’t alive after I’m done with them.”

The shock jock asked whether the film was going to be a documentary. Mr. Weinstein said no, that it would be a “big movie like a ‘Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.’”

The movie mogul said his vision was to scare people away from firearms. He foresees moviegoers to leave thinking, “Gun stocks — I don’t want to be involved in that stuff. It’s going to be like crash and burn.”

Hate to tell you this, Harvs, but you’re just not that important. You may be a Hollywood mogul with lots of pull in Tinseltown, but to the rest of us, you’re merely a bloated bag of ass. You, Meryl Streep and the rest of the celebutards who live in gated communities with armed guards, can replace stolen property at the drop of a hat, and are far removed from the realities of those who face armed thugs breaking into their homes, assaulting their families and stealing their property, just don’t have that much pull.

Your vapid, sniveling histrionics on the big screen will not negate the indelible fact that the Second Amendment is part of our history, heritage and values, that the right to keep and bear arms is critical to protect the right to life and property, and that this right is a vital part of a truly free society.

You have no comprehension of these values, because you’re insulated from the real world.

Stern, to his credit did indicate the hypocrisy that is Weinstein, pointing out a project in which Weinstein addresses Jews defending themselves during the Holocaust. THAT is apparently OK, but only if there’s genocide or concentration camps involved.

…the producer said he would have used a gun to stop from going to a concentration camp if he “found a gun, and if that was happening to my people.”

Remember when I said this rancid douche was far removed from reality? Apparently he thinks that when he’s being marched to a concentration camp, he will just happen upon a gun and will start shooting!

Ummm… hate to tell you this, Spanky, but that just doesn’t happen in real life!

Nanny Bloomberg sticking his nose in the Old Dominion’s business… again.


Readers of this blog are familiar with our opinion of “former Republican” Stalinist yankee lawn gnome and New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg (Summary: it ain’t good.) He’s spending close to $2 million trying to defeat Ken Cuccinelli, the pro-liberty, pro-gun, RLCVA-endorsed Republican gubernatorial candidate this year, due to his having the audacity to stand against the Gnome’s plans to eventually disarm us all. That’s bad enough. But to make matters worse, now, he’s pouring in over $1 million to defeat pro-liberty, pro-gun, RLCVA-endorsed Republican attorney general candidate Mark Obenshain, for the same reasons.

I have had more than enough of this clown interfering in Virginia politics. From trying to ban large size sugary beverages to his ceaseless assault on our Second Amendment-guaranteed liberties, the Gnome is wrong on practically every single public policy issue of any consequence. It’s bad enough that he may succeed in making Terry McAuliffe, a contemptible human being if ever there was one, the next governor of the Old Dominion, but he’s now trying to help Mark Herring, a standard issue anti-gun Democrat state senator, come from behind to defeat Obenshain. Folks, I’ve had occasion to meet Mark Obenshain a bunch of times during the campaign. We don’t agree on every single thing, just as I don’t with Ken Cuccinelli, Rand Paul or anyone else. That said, he’s honest, forthright, down to earth, and actually listens when you talk with him. He understands the value of personal liberty, and that it’s actually possible to respect it while simultaneously doing the job of enforcing the law. He knows who he is, what he believes, and why he believes it, and is actually dedicated to public service in the finest traditions of our Commonwealth. He’s also the only statewide candidate of the seven out there to have run a relentlessly positive, upbeat, issues-based campaign. He’s actually focused on why he wants to be Attorney General and what he’ll do with the job when he gets it.

We cannot simply stand by and permit anti-liberty out-of-state influences like the Gnome to have this kind of impact unopposed. To that end, I’ll just share the image from Mark’s campaign that came out earlier today (click on it) and you’ll know what to do:


And get out on Tuesday, November 5th, and VOTE VOTE VOTE for Mark Obenshain… and Ken Cuccinelli. Talk to everyone you know who’s undecided. Convince them, and do what you can to make sure THEY get out to support Ken and Mark.

And as for Michael Bloomberg, he needs to get lost and stay there, permanently. People like him have made places like NYC and most of the Northeast into what it is today. Let’s not allow them to do the same to Virginia.

Assholes at Salon: Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American


You think I’m kidding? Loathsome asstards at Salon actually published this drooling dreck of a piece by some self-loathing, metrosexual cockgobbler named David Sirota, who vomits his sincere desire to see a white guy be responsible for the murder of three, including a young child, as well as hundreds of grave injuries.


Because you see, since white people are privileged, and therefore aren’t immediately suspected of terrorism. It’s mostly the poor, underprivileged minorities that get the blame and are “collectively slandered” whenever mass murders happen.

…privilege tends to determine: 1) which groups are — and are not — collectively denigrated or targeted for the unlawful actions of individuals; and 2) how big and politically game-changing the overall reaction ends up being.

This has been most obvious in the context of recent mass shootings. In those awful episodes, a religious or ethnic minority group lacking such privilege would likely be collectively slandered and/or targeted with surveillance or profiling (or worse) if some of its individuals comprised most of the mass shooters. However, white male privilege means white men are not collectively denigrated/targeted for those shootings — even though most come at the hands of white dudes.

Likewise, in the context of terrorist attacks, such privilege means white non-Islamic terrorists are typically portrayed not as representative of whole groups or ideologies, but as “lone wolf” threats to be dealt with as isolated law enforcement matters. Meanwhile, non-white or developing-world terrorism suspects are often reflexively portrayed as representative of larger conspiracies, ideologies and religions that must be dealt with as systemic threats — the kind potentially requiring everything from law enforcement action to military operations to civil liberties legislation to foreign policy shifts.

There is so much FAIL here, I’m getting a headache just thinking about it!

Apparently, even though data show that more terrorist attacks have been perpetrated by non-Muslims than Muslims, Shitslurper over there is upset that we’re waging a “War on Terrorism,” because it’s, by its nature a war on Muslim terrorism.

Let’s take a look and see how many fundamentalist Muslim attacks we have seen since 2000, shall we? But instead of using a link from an obviously biased source like ThinkProgress used by Shitslurper, let’s use… oh… Wikipedia.

  1. 2000 H. Rap Brown(Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin) shoots two police officers
  2. 2000 New York terror attack
  3. 2000 millennium attack plots
  4. 2001 September 11 attacks
  5. 2002 Los Angeles Airport shooting
  6. 2002 José Padilla (Abdullah al-Muhajir) Plot
  7. 2002 Buffalo Six
  8. 2002 John Allen Muhammad (Washington Sniper) killings
  9. 2003 Columbus Shopping Mall bombing plot
  10. 2004 financial buildings plot
  11. 2005 Los Angeles bomb plot
  12. 2006 Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar SUV attack
  13. 2006 Sears Tower plot
  14. 2006 Seattle Jewish Federation shooting
  15. 2006 Toledo terror plot
  16. 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot
  17. 2007 Fort Dix attack plot
  18. 2007 John F. Kennedy International Airport attack plot
  19. 2009 Little Rock recruiting office shooting
  20. 2009 Bronx terrorism plot
  21. 2009 Dallas Car Bomb Plot by Hosam Maher Husein Smadi
  22. 2009 New York subway and United Kingdom plot
  23. 2009 Fort Hood shooting
  24. 2009 Colleen LaRose arrested (not made public until March 2010)
  25. 2009 Failed Christmas bombing of Northwest Flight 253 (a.k.a. “Underwear Bomber” incident)
  26. 2010 Attempted suicide car crash on Whitestone Bridge
  27. 2010 2010 Times Square car bombing attempt
  28. 2010 King Salmon, Alaska local meteorologist and wife assassination plots
  29. 2010 Alleged Washington Metro bomb plot
  30. 2010 Alleged car bomb plot against Portland, Oregon Christmas tree lighting ceremony
  31. 2010 Alleged plot to bomb military recruiting center in Catonsville, Maryland
  32. 2010 Abu Talhah al-Amrikee death threats to South Park Creators- See: Zachary Adam Chesser
  33. 2011 Alleged Saudi Arabian student bomb plots
  34. 2011 Manhattan terrorism plot
  35. 2011 Lone Wolf New York City, Bayonne,NJ pipe bombs plot.
  36. 2011 Alleged plot to attack Pentagon, U.S. Capitol with model aircraft packed with explosives
  37. 2012 Car bomb plot in Florida.
  38. 2012 February 17: An illegal immigrant from Morocco was arrested near the Capitol after an undercover investigation into an alleged plot to carry out a suicide attack on the national landmark that houses Congress. Amine el-Khalifi, 29, was picked up while carrying an inoperable gun and a fake suicide vest provided to him by undercover FBI agents posing as al-Qaeda associates.

These are the attacks of which we are aware. I’m fairly sure there are more the general population knows nothing about. But let’s go with 38.

In comparison, since 2000, the number of other attacks is as follows:

KKK violence – 0

White Supremacy – 1 (The Spokane bombing attempt)

Christian Extremism – 1 (the guy who killed abortion provider George Tiller in 2009)

Black militancy – 1 (the nuts who planned the Sears Tower plot)

Jewish militancy – 1 (the JDL plot to blow up the King Fahd Mosque)

The only lunatics who rival the Muslims in the number of attacks are the eco-terrorist assholes, who are responsible for millions of dollars worth of property damage, but generally stick to vandalism and break-ins instead of targeting innocent Americans. But while I don’t discount them here, they’re a different animal altogether (no pun intended).

But according to this emasculated fuck, poor Muslims are constantly suspected in bombings such as this latest one in Boston, and IT’S JUST NOT FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIR!!!

And that’s why he hopes that a white American committed this crime. Because the perpetrator matters.

The death of a child doesn’t matter.

The deaths of two others don’t matter.

Loss of limbs, blood, gore and agony don’t matter.

What matters is that the poor Muslims will get the blame!

This is proof positive that the assholes at Salon who published this written diarrhea and its author are heartless, repugnant, pernicious shitstains.

In case you didn’t know.

You’re welcome.

Gun Grabbing Nanny Bloomberg & MAIG At It Again


Per the NYT:

The commercial is an unambiguous appeal to gun owners: a middle-aged hunter, rifle in hand, vows that he will fight to protect the Second Amendment.The commercial is an unambiguous appeal to gun owners: a middle-aged hunter, rifle in hand, vows that he will fight to protect the Second Amendment But in a sensible, father-of-the-house tone, he also urges voters to support comprehensive background checks, “so criminals and the dangerously mentally ill can’t buy guns.”

The man behind the advertisement is not known for his kinship with the gun crowd: Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, the nation’s fiercest advocate of restrictions on firearms since the December rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

Determined to persuade Congress to act in response to that shooting, Mr. Bloomberg on Monday will begin bankrolling a $12 million national advertising campaign that focuses on senators who he believes might be persuaded to support a pending package of federal regulations to curb gun violence. The ads, in 13 states, will blanket those senators’ districts during an Easter Congressional recess that is to be followed by debate over the legislation.

It goes without saying that authoritarian scumbags like Michael Bloomberg think they know better than we do. Given his propensity for going after large sodas and salt, there’s no level of micromanagement he won’t stoop to. On Meet The Press, to fellow anti-gun left-wing stool-pigeon David Gregory, he said:

“[W]hile I think we are going to win this [background checks], celebrating in advance isn’t the right thing to do. We’ve got to go out, we’ve got a lot of work ahead of us. … I don’t think we should give up on the assault weapons ban. But clearly, it is a more difficult issue for a lot of people. And I don’t know that that reflects the N.R.A.’s power. It may be just that people have different views about assault weapons than they do about background checks. … I think I have a responsibility, and I think you and all of your viewers have responsibilities, to try to make this country safer for our families and for each other. And if I can do that by spending some money and taking the NRA from being the only voice to being one of the voices, … then I think my money would be well spent … If 90% of the public want something, and their representatives vote against that, common sense says, they are going to have a price to pay for that.”

Bring it on. We’ll make it our business to punish you and your friends, Nanny.

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: