It appears the leftards have drawn a line in the sand. At least a radical, twisted cabal among them has…
For instance, Georgetown law (the school that spawned the drooling slut that is Sandra Fluke) professor Louis Michael Seidman has made a proposition – published by CBS News – Take Our Country Back from the Constitution. He posits that the Law of our Land is anachronistic and irrelevant, and should be ignored.
Not all of it, of course… just the parts with which he and his prog-nazi mafia disagree.
This, of course, means the Second Amendment is simply an antiquated, outmoded, extraneous mess that prevents the dictatorial, despotic vermin he supports from imposing their will on the rest of us. And that is absolutely unacceptable!
But what happens when the issue gets Constitutional-ized? Then we turn the question over to lawyers, and lawyers do with it what lawyers do. So instead of talking about whether gun control makes sense in our country, we talk about what people thought of it two centuries ago.
Worse yet, talking about gun control in terms of constitutional obligation needlessly raises the temperature of political discussion. Instead of a question on policy, about which reasonable people can disagree, it becomes a test of one’s commitment to our foundational document and, so, to America itself.
Yes. God and Goddess forbid that a lawyer who teaches the law at one of the nation’s top law schools actually respect the law that he is supposed to be teaching!
Instead of attempting to understand why the old, white guys who founded this nation, and who created a government that is intentionally limited, with the ultimate power residing with the people, felt that the right to keep and bear arms was critical to our freedoms…
Instead of examining the reasons for the Founders’ distrust of powerful, centralized governments…
Instead of exploring the history, the philosophy, the debate and the ultimate product of what this makes this nation and its laws so unique, and having respect for it…
This pathetic coward simply wants to dismantle the parts he does not like – in order to make it easier for tyrants to do what they do best – subjugate the people from whom their power stems in the first place.
Well, Dr. Seidman – you’ve asked for it. You have drawn a line in the sand, and millions of Americans, who respect the law and respect their freedoms will answer the call.
You want the Congress and the President to ignore their oaths – solemn vows they took when they were entrusted with the power to uphold the laws of this country?
Instead of preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States, as they solemnly swore to do, you want them to simply ignore their pledge?
You will not like the consequences of these actions, you treasonous swine.
Because there are millions of others – members of the United States military, law enforcement and others – who took another oath:
I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
The first part of this oath – to protect the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic – that is our call to duty. And those who call on the highest powers in this land to violate their oaths of office and discard the Law of the Land are enemies of the Constitution.
We will protect the Constitution. We will defend the Law of the Land against the perfidious swine that aim to destroy it. And that would be you, Professor. That would be you and any other authoritarian pig who aims to destroy the foundations of this country and the laws upon which it was built.
I didn’t leave the USSR – a nation that did not understand or respect the individual rights and freedoms that the Constitution specifically protects in this country – only to see it destroyed by wannabe tyrants such as you. I took an oath in the military, and I took one as a civilian:
I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.
This oath may not mean anything to you, but it means something to me.
So you’re welcome to try and scrap the Constitution. You’re free to advocate its destruction.
Just know you are now the enemy. You are now the foe of the Constitution, of the Law of the Land and of the very principles on which this nation was built. And you are the one against whom the Constitution is to be protected. Go ahead. Try and advocate treason.
I guarantee you will not like the consequences.