This is proof positive that science has been corrupted by power-hungry, fraud-loving politicians.  This is no joke. The University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU) files have been hacked, and the director of the CRU Phil Jones has acknowledged that the files belong to them. They are proof positive that global warming research is fraudulent and has been corrupted by political motives.

Jones claims the files were obtained illegally as if that absolves the content. It doesn’t and it is enough to destroy all their careers. Jones gave a foretaste of his behavior in 2005. Warwick Hughes asked for the data and method he used for his claim of a 0.6°C temperature rise since the end of the nineteenth century. Jones responded, “We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?”  He has stonewalled ever since. The main reason was because it was used as a key argument in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Reports to convince the world humans caused rapid warming in the 20th century. The emails obtained are a frightening record of arrogance, and deception far beyond his 2005 effort.

Another glimpse into what the files and emails reveal was the report by Professor Deming. He wrote, “ With publication of an article in Science (in 1995) I gained sufficient credibility in the community of scientists working on climate change. They thought I was one of them someone who would pervert science in the service of social and political causes. So one of them let his guard down. A major person working in the area of climate change and global warming sent me an astonishing email that said. “We must get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”  The person in question was Jonathan Overpeck and his even more revealing emails are part of those exposed by the hacker. It is now very clear that Deming’s charge was precise. They have perverted science in the service of social and political causes.

Professor Wegman showed how this “community of scientists” published together and peer reviewed each other’s work. I was always suspicious about why peer review was such a big deal. Now all my suspicions are confirmed. The emails reveal how they controlled the process, including manipulating some of the major journals like Science and Nature. We know the editor of the Journal of Climate, Andrew Weaver, was one of the “community”. They organized lists of reviewers when required making sure they gave the editor only favorable names. They threatened to isolate and marginalize one editor who they believed was recalcitrant.

Total Control

These people controlled the global weather data used by the IPCC through the joint Hadley and CRU and produced the HadCRUT data. They controlled the IPCC, especially crucial chapters and especially preparation of the Summary for PolicyMakers (SPM). Stephen Schneider was a prime mover there from the earliest reports to the most influential in 2001. They also had a left wing conduit to the New York Times. The emails between Andy Revkin and the community are very revealing and must place his journalistic integrity in serious jeopardy. Of course the IPCC Reports and especially the SPM Reports are the basis for Kyoto and the Copenhagen Accord, but now we know they are based on completely falsified and manipulated data and science. It is no longer a suspicion. Surely this is the death knell for the CRU, the IPCC, Kyoto and Copenhagen and the Carbon Credits shell game.

All the files are here:




And I believe this is proof positive that this vast fraud that was perpetrated on the entire population of the world served to do two things: redistribute income and give politicians more authority over the lives of their citizens.

The scum in Congress passed the insane Cap and Trade bill.  Why?  For a purpose that was false and misleading, but one that, if passed, served to give them power and cost us a fortune.

The Washington Post covered the story here, but it doesn't even begin to touch the vast fraud that was perpetrated on the world! And the title: 

In the trenches on climate change, hostility among foes

Stolen e-mails reveal venomous feelings toward skeptics

This is not just about hostility.  This is about the biggest lie to perpetuate political means I've ever run across!

As of this writing, I have found only 321 stories on Google News when I type in the keywords "global warming" and "fraud."  I'd like to see more media outlets pick this up.  Will they?