Another homeowner acquitted in Texas

Some may be appalled that this Texas homeowner used deadly force when a bunch of teenagers broke into his home.

Yes, they were looking for drinks and snacks... supposedly.  But consider this:  when you're an elderly homeowner and a bunch of individuals break into your home, is your first thought, "Oh!  They must just be hungry!" or "Someone's in my house, and I need to protect myself!"

Luckily, the jury in this case thought the latter was a logical rationale, so they acquitted Jose Luis Gonzalez, 63, of murdering Francisco Anguiano, who was 13 when he and three friends broke into Gonzalez's trailer in July 2007.

However, Assistant District Attorney Uriel Druker maintained during his closing arguments that the case was not about homeowners' right to protect their property, but about when a person is justified in using deadly force to do so.

"What really took place here was a case of vigilantism," he said after the verdict. "A 13-year-old boy was killed because a man was enraged."

No, a 13-year-old boy was killed because he invaded someone's home.  It's called breaking and entering, and it's a crime.  Why is it that his age needs to absolve him of dealing with the consequences of his actions?

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 9/29/2008 8:36 PM Kent McManigal wrote:
    This is the kind of thing I have been chewed out for advocating in the past. I have actually been told that since I believe in deadly force even if the attackers may not have a gun, I will be convicted if I ever am forced to defend myself.

    When someone breaks in, or starts attacking, it is not the time to second guess the victim's reaction. You are not going to assume that they won't kill you. Not if you want to survive the encounter.
    Reply to this
    1. 9/29/2008 8:50 PM Nicki wrote:
      I think it depends on what state you live in.

      Reply to this
  • 10/2/2008 3:40 PM Rurik wrote:
    Jose deserves an award for having done a civic duty. Calendar years don't really count; I've seem a number of pretty beefy 13 year-olds. Good riddance. Any report on the citizenship status of those involved?
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.